电影2012影评

doc文档可能在WAP端浏览体验不佳。建议您优先选择TXT，或下载源文件到本机查看。 2012 Doomsday 2012 世界末日

This is one of those \"Christian-based\" films with a fair amount of preaching, so be forewarned. This is the basic fault that I found with this film. Instead of telling a story and letting the viewer make his or her own decision, it's always being shoved in peoples' faces. I do not have anything against people of any religious persuasion, until they start preaching. This is the problem of people who think they are following Christ's example. Christians today, especially in America, do not follow Christ's teachings, or at least they may think that they do, but most only end up sounding very ignorant and unable to reason. Most become intolerant of everybody else unless it's Christian and start to see \"demons\" behind every door. This isn't spirituality, this is madness. What I find strange as well, is that so many Christian films feel that they must keep up with secular films by putting in lots of violence in their films. Aren't American Christians

able to watch a film that isn't steeped in violence, and if not, why? A question to think about. I would think that following the teachings of a man like Christ would eventually change one's nature somewhat. These are a few problems that infiltrates Christian-based films. I noted as well, a lot of \"Colonial\" themes going on in this film. The untrue notion about non-native peoples having been to Mexico before Columbus is an atrocious colonial/imperialistic mindset that white supremacists also would like to believe is true, as well as the fact that all of the caucasian people in the film save the pregnant Mexican woman. (I'm not sure if she was supposed to be indigenous, she didn't appear Native American in the least.) Again, more colonial thought: the Europeans must save the lost indigenous peoples. This is something akin to the themes of Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom. The white guy always has to save the \"savages,\" nevermind that in anthropological classifications, Indians (from India) are basically caucasoid. It's all about skin colour, still, to this day. And of course, the \"savages\" have no true God. They must know the one, true God. Personally, the movie wasn't all that bad as a whole, but all

of what I mentioned is offensive, especially since I have relatives who are not only 100% Native American (Cree Indians), but close relatives who are mixed with Native American as well. Most have had their lives destroyed or damaged by religion. My mother-in-law's family was torn apart and taken away by Catholic missionaries when she was younger. This is just one example. If anything, if so-called Christians want to improve the world, make a film about what we should do to stop global warming; how to be better neighbours to one another; how to end war; how to be more peaceful and loving; how to treat all living things with care and respect. Many other spiritual paths teach this, Hinduism for example. Jesus Christ wouldn't want Christians to focus on so much violent death and destruction if he were here, he would want us to focus on life, joy, and peace. After all, he claimed to die for our sins and that we should be living examples of Christ, no? I would recommend to all Christian filmmakers to stop focusing so much on death and destruction as a means to an end. All the bloodshed and violence just isn't worth whatever strange visions or endings they may believe

they may have waiting in store! Also, by promoting violence in

your films, you are succumbing to secular modes of film-making. 2012 Doomsday 世界末日》 《2012 世界末日》 影评 2008 级英语教育系 15 班 姓名 学号 王琪鑫 2008061140

本TXT由“文库宝”下载:http://www.mozhua.net/wenkubao本文由hh870828贡献 doc文档可能在WAP端浏览体验不佳。建议您优先选择TXT，或下载源文件到本机查看。 电影\"2012\"影评

“2012 年 12 月 21 日黑暗降临后，12 月 22 日的黎明永远不会到来。” 历史上从来没有 一个日期， 能如 2012 年 12 月 21 日这样对人类产生巨大影响。 玛雅文明预言它是世界末日， 而各个文化、种族，全球的科学家、政府，都无法预知这一天到底会发生什么。 《2012》是 一部关于全球毁灭的灾难电影，它讲述在 2012 年世界末日到来时，我们的主人公如何挣扎 求生。 杰克逊·柯蒂斯(约翰·库萨克饰)带着孩子去黄石公园度假，却发现曾有美好回忆的湖泊 已经干涸，而这个地区也成为了禁区。充满疑惑的他在黄石附近的营地偶然认识了查理。查 理告诉他由于自然环境和资源长期被人类掠夺性破坏，地球自身的平衡系统已经面临崩溃， 人类即将面临空前的自然灾害。查理说有些国家已经在联合秘密研制并建造可以躲避这个 灾难的方舟。杰克逊以为他是个疯子，就一笑而过走开了。 然而第二天，灾难就发生了。强烈的地震、巨大的火山爆发让眼前熟悉的家园变成了 人间炼狱。在地球的其他地方，各种各样的自然灾害也以前所未有的规模爆发。杰克逊和众 多家庭一样踏上了求生之路。 面对全球性自然灾害不知何去何从的他突然想起查理提到过的 方舟和地图，于是决定前往方舟基地寻找生存的机会。 在寻找和前往方舟基地的过程中， 杰克逊一家经历了生死考验。 最终他们终于到达方舟 基地。 然而已经制造完成的方舟数量远远不能满足从世界各地闻讯涌来的受灾人群。 谁去谁 留已然成为挑战整个人类的道德抉择。 面对灾难， 来自不同国家的人类做出了最重要的抉择： “所有人都是平等的，都有平等的生存机会！”最后人们终于在方舟中度过了这一全球性的灾 害，获得了继续繁衍和发展的希望。 影片《2012》中所谓的“世界末日”，我们既不必当真，也不必批判。 世界末日这件事情，纯粹站在科学的立场上说，这个可能性总是存在的。因为不可知的 灾难什么时候都可能发生——也许下一个小时就是末日， 这个可能性也存在， 只不过它的概 率非常小而已。况且按照我们的唯物主义理论，这个世界有始也有终，地球本身，太阳系本 身， 也都有生命周期， 都有衰老死亡之日， 那时候当然就是世界末日了。 从这个意义上来说， 世界末日当然是存在的。 但问题是，当我们现在讨论对于世界末日之说“相不相信”时，我们是另有暗含问题的。 当我们谈论“相不相信”时，我们其实暗含着另外一个问题——那就是：如果你信了，你准备 怎么生活下去？如果你不信，你又准备怎么生活下去？ 比方说，如果你确信一年之后是世界末日了，和你确信一年之后世界还将是正常的，你 此刻的生活态度就会不一样。在前面一种情形下，也许你觉得反正再过两年世界就完蛋了， 从现在开始很多约束你都不愿意接受了，你想吃喝玩乐，你想醉生梦死，你想倒行逆施„„ 如果你相信世界还是正常的，那你当然不会胡来了。也就是说，你是不是打算按照一年后世 界要毁灭来安排你现在的生活。理智告诉我们，绝大部分人都不可能这样安排生活，都不可 能接受这个假设来安排生活。绝大部分人，只要还有理性，肯定会按照“两年后世界将是正 常的”这一假定来安排自己的生活。 那么为什么大部分人在这种情形下都会相信世界将是正常的呢。 因为根据现有的科学理 论，我们可以知道两年后世界将是正常的，即使太阳系真会发生什么变化，那也是长周期的 变化，几年的时间尺度之内当然感觉不到。 那么为什么我们相信科学， 而不相信神秘主义的预言呢？那是因为， 科学在以往这几百 年里所取得的业绩， 让我们相信这个理论是管用的， 它对于大部分自然现象的解释是正确的。 比方说，它对万有引力的理解是正确的，以至于我们可以发射一艘飞船飞向火星，居然就真 能在火星上着陆， 这说明我们计算的轨道是正确的，

我们计算这个轨道所依据的整套理论也

是正确的，如果它有一点不正确，飞船就飞不到那里去。从这个意义上说，科学的权威当然 是最大的。大部分人面临这个选择的时候，还是愿意选择科学。选择科学，我们当然假定两 年后世界还将是正常的，我们当然也就不信末日预言了。 有人曾预言，影片《2012》上映之后，大家会更加热衷于谈论“世界末日”之类的神秘主 义话题，现在看来倒是有点不幸而言中了。当然，作为谈资，看完电影后，沿着电影里神秘 主义的话题继续讨论讨论，这很自然，也常能令人愉快，也不至于有多大害处。可是你不会 因为这个而改变你对生活的预期和安排——你明天该上班还是要上班！

本TXT由“文库宝”下载:http://www.mozhua.net/wenkubao